CCP Kamikazes: China Mass Producing Low-Cost, High-Volume Drones for Swarm Warfare
China’s reported development of the Feilong-300D suicide Kamikaze drone—a low-cost loitering munition designed for mass production at scale—raises a far more urgent question than capability alone: if Beijing is truly producing these systems in the tens of thousands, how much does the United States actually know about it? Joshua Philipp, Senior Investigative Reporter with the Epoch Times and Casey Fleming, CEO of BlackOps Partners are available together or separately on this topic.
How would they be deployed? Is there a scenario in which they could be launched from Cuba, Mexico, or Canada, into the U.S. with explosive devices that detonate upon impact? Would they be equipped with bioweapons or contagious viruses? Does the U.S. have an ability to stop them? Some might remember a CCP surveillance balloon traversing the country.
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO CROSSROADS YOUTUBE CHANNEL
- Fear-mongering or not, if China is mass-producing kamikaze drones like the Feilong-300D, that’s a strategic reality the U.S. needs to verify.
- China has mastered economies of scale and low-cost manufacturing—and is now applying it to warfare, kamikaze-style.
- Cheap, high-volume drones could overwhelm expensive U.S. defense systems.
- The CCP’s tight information control raises concerns about U.S. intelligence gaps.
- The bigger issue: China may be preparing to outproduce and outpace U.S. military capabilities.
This isn’t just another incremental weapons update. At an estimated cost of around $10,000 per unit and a range approaching 1,000 kilometers, the Feilong-300D represents a shift toward industrialized drone warfare—where volume, not just sophistication, becomes the decisive factor. Swarm tactics using thousands of expendable drones could overwhelm even the most advanced U.S. and allied air defense systems, flipping the traditional cost equation and forcing America to spend disproportionately to counter cheap, disposable threats like kamikaze drones.
But the deeper story—and where Casey Fleming and Joshua Philipp can provide critical insight—is the intelligence gap this development may expose.
The Chinese Communist Party operates within one of the most tightly controlled information environments in the world. Unlike the United States, where adversaries have previously exploited openness—from surveillance balloons crossing U.S. airspace to the long-running concerns over espionage networks embedded through academic and technological exchange—China’s internal military developments are deliberately shielded from outside scrutiny. Large-scale production of a weapon like the Feilong-300D Kamikaze drone would require significant industrial coordination, supply chain movement, and testing infrastructure. If that level of activity is underway, it raises a pressing question: is U.S. intelligence fully tracking it—or playing catch-up?
This is where Fleming’s background in national security strategy and Philipp’s investigative work on CCP influence operations intersect powerfully. Together, they can assess not just the kamikaze weapon itself, but what its emergence suggests about China’s doctrine, transparency, and America’s blind spots.
If confirmed, this isn’t just about kamikaze drones—it’s about whether the U.S. is once again being outmaneuvered in the gray zone between intelligence failure and strategic surprise. The Feilong-300D kamikaze could signal that Beijing is preparing for a future conflict defined not by singular high-end platforms, but by overwhelming, low-cost saturation attacks deployed at scale.
The bottom line: if China is building these kamikaze drones in the volumes being suggested, that fact alone constitutes actionable intelligence—and the American public, policymakers, and defense community should be asking why they’re only hearing about it now.
Relevant Article(s):
OPTIONAL Q&A
- How credible are reports that China is producing the Feilong-300D kamikaze drones at scale, and what indicators would U.S. intelligence rely on to verify that?
- If these kamikaze drones are being manufactured in the tens of thousands, how could such a large program evade or limit detection by U.S. intelligence agencies?
- What does the Feilong-300D reveal about the Chinese Communist Party’s shift toward “mass attrition” warfare rather than high-end, one-off systems?
- Could a swarm of low-cost suicide drones realistically overwhelm current U.S. and allied air defense systems, and where are the biggest vulnerabilities?
- Why does China appear able to conceal internal military developments so effectively, while the U.S. remains comparatively exposed to foreign surveillance and espionage?
- Does this point to a broader intelligence gap between what China is developing and what the U.S. publicly understands about those capabilities?
- How should the U.S. respond if the cost-exchange ratio in warfare is being flipped by cheap, expendable weapons like the Feilong-300D?
- Is the bigger threat the drone itself—or what its existence suggests about China’s long-term strategic planning and America’s ability to anticipate it?
ABOUT JOSHUA PHILIPP…
Joshua Philipp is an award-winning journalist and Senior Investigative Reporter at The Epoch Times. He is the host of ‘Crossroads,’ a news and analysis program on EpochTV. Subscribe at Crossroads with Joshua Philipp – YouTube His works have included breakthrough investigations into the origins of Covid-19 and the Wuhan laboratory in the early days of the pandemic. He spearheaded the first documentary on the lab leak origins of the COVID-19 virus, released in April 2020. This groundbreaking documentary garnered over 75 million views, and while many tried to label it misinformation, its findings have since been vindicated by the White House and US intelligence agencies.
ABOUT CASEY FLEMING…
Casey Fleming is an internationally recognized keynote speaker and author on national security, intelligence, and strategic risk.
As Chief Executive Officer of BlackOps Partners Corporation, Mr. Fleming is at the forefront of evolving strategic risk affecting global leaders. His leadership has enabled organizations to proactively identify hidden risks and uncover new opportunities within their operations and supply networks.
His extensive contributions extend beyond technology and strategy. His insights in unrestricted war and cognitive war have been regularly featured in conferences, media interviews, prominent publications, documentaries, and as a TEDx speaker. Notable recognition includes Cybersecurity Professional of the Year from the Cybersecurity Excellence Awards and the Directorship 100 Governance Award from the National Association of Corporate Directors.
Mr. Fleming’s expertise is sought after by a diverse range of institutions, including the private sector, domestic and foreign governments, and academia. He offers guidance to the Fortune 500, Congress, the Pentagon, the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National Counterintelligence Security Center (NCSC), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), The White House, and other vital institutions responsible for national security and strategic decision-making. He serves as an expert witness in matters of strategic risk, counterintelligence, and national security.
He has held pivotal roles as a board-appointed turnaround executive for Silicon Valley companies, executive for Deloitte Consulting’s Global Risk and Strategy Group, and founding executive for IBM’s early cybersecurity division, now known as IBM Security.
Mr. Fleming earned his bachelor’s degree from Texas A&M University and served as an instructor within IBM’s internal MBA program. He continued his leadership acumen through executive programs at Harvard Business School, The Wharton School, and IBM Executive Leadership.
TO SCHEDULE AN INTERVIEW, CALL OR TEXT 512-966-0983 OR EMAIL BOOKINGS@SPECIALGUESTS.COM
