Leads to same “No Kings” Protests Dark Money Funding
For counterintelligence expert Casey Fleming, the escalating anti-ICE protests — many of which have devolved into riots in cities like Los Angeles and Minneapolis — are not organic uprisings driven by grassroots outrage. They are astroturf operations, manufactured and funded from the top down, using the same financial networks and organizers behind the so-called No Kings protests that erupted nationwide.
At the center of this network, according to growing congressional scrutiny, is Neville Roy Singham, whose funding apparatus traces back to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and runs through a maze of nonprofits and activist front groups. Fleming says this network has quietly bankrolled far-left agitators involved in anti-ICE demonstrations that escalated into violence — including in Los Angeles and most recently in Minnesota — often featuring the same individuals, the same messaging, and the same protest infrastructure.
“These aren’t grassroots protests,” Fleming says. “They’re astroturf riots — funded, organized, and amplified with precision. And when you follow the money, you keep finding the same names.”
That trail is now being examined by the House Oversight Committee, which is probing Singham’s ties to the Party for Socialism and Liberation and related entities accused of intentionally organizing and amplifying disruptive protests designed to destabilize the country. Oversight Republicans are investigating whether these groups are waging a coordinated influence campaign aimed at overwhelming U.S. institutions, eroding trust in federal law enforcement, and manufacturing chaos.
Yet despite mounting evidence, much of the legacy media has remained conspicuously silent. Fleming suggests that silence may not be accidental. “When BILLIONS of dollars in foreign money is involved,” he notes, “pressure is applied — editorial pressure, narrative pressure — to look the other way.” The question Fleming poses to journalists is blunt: Will you follow the money, or keep pretending this is spontaneous outrage?
Fleming frames the ICE riots not as isolated events but as repeatable operations. The same activists, the same slogans, the same visual branding, and the same funding pipelines appear each time federal authority is challenged. You’d think with all that money they could at least vary font type and size on their astroturf-looking signs!
According to Fleming, the goal of socialist and communist agitators is not reform — it is overload. By overwhelming systems like immigration enforcement, policing, housing, and social services, they seek to make free enterprise and constitutional governance look unworkable, softening the public to accept centralized control as the “solution.”
“It worked in New York,” Fleming says. “So why wouldn’t they try it in Minnesota?”
This strategy is not new. Fleming points to Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals (1971) by Saul Alinsky as the operational playbook. The book outlines tactics such as ridicule, relentless pressure, emotional provocation, and constant adaptation to empower “Have-Nots” to seize power and force social, political, and economic change. Fleming notes that Alinsky explicitly framed activism as warfare — and famously dedicated the book to Satan, whom he called “the first radical,” a symbolic model for modern agitators who view disruption and inversion as virtues!
“These tactics are being applied exactly as written,” Fleming argues. “What people are watching on the streets is not activism — it’s doctrine in action.”
Color Revolutions historically exploit legitimate grievances, then flood them with money, organization, and media amplification until unrest becomes self-sustaining. Fleming warns that the United States is now experiencing this model domestically, with ICE enforcement serving as a trigger point. While Americans argue over symptoms, foreign adversaries and ideological extremists advance their objectives behind the scenes.
For Fleming, the House Oversight investigation represents a rare opportunity to expose how deep the operation runs — but only if the public insists on transparency and refuses to be distracted by the theatrics of astroturf outrage.
Relevant Article: United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Investigate Funding Behind Los Angeles Riots Linked to the Chinese Communist Party
OPTIONAL Q&A
- What evidence shows the same astroturf funding networks behind No Kings and anti-ICE riots?
- How does Neville Roy Singham’s nonprofit web connect back to CCP interests?
- Why would foreign adversaries want to overwhelm ICE and immigration enforcement specifically?
- How does Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals show up in modern protest tactics?
- Why is ridicule and visual sameness a hallmark of organized astroturf movements?
- How does overwhelming systems make free enterprise look like the problem?
- What role does media silence play when billions in foreign money are involved?
- What happens if Congress fails to act on what Oversight uncovers?
CONTACT:
Jerry McGlothlin
CEO
Special Guests
919-437-0001 mobile/text
Celebrating our 40-year anniversary
Providing Expert Guests to Talk Shows from 1986-2026
Money
