Fatal Redactions in Epstein Case Demands Public Outcry Louder than Swamp’s Blackout
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is expected to release files tied to Jeffrey Epstein, with reports that victims’ names will be redacted with an implication that clients’ names are revealed. On its face, this should be a breakthrough moment in the pursuit of truth. Yet, history suggests otherwise. Washington’s pattern of selective transparency, endless redactions, and swamp protectionism raises real questions about whether the public will ever get the unvarnished truth about Epstein’s network.
Additional redactions are expected to be hidden behind claims of other “ongoing investigations.”
Investigative reporter Nick Bryant is the man who first published Epstein’s black book and flight logs back in 2015. He lives this case every day and has a Ph.D. in all things Epstein.
Visit Epstein Justice Home – Epstein Justice
Already, key voices are muddying the waters. William Barr recently insisted that Donald Trump is not damaged by any forthcoming disclosures. But Barr’s credibility on Epstein is hardly clean. His father, Donald Barr, not only authored disturbing novels but also gave Epstein his first job as a math teacher at an elite prep school despite Epstein lacking a college degree. That decision set Epstein on the path that would lead to decades of abuse and power-brokering. For William Barr to act as arbiter of what is or isn’t damaging reeks of insider management rather than independent truth-seeking.
Meanwhile, conservative influencers who once thrived on exposing scandals have gone conspicuously silent. After the Turning Point USA conference in July, MAGA-aligned voices suddenly pivoted away from the Epstein story. Trump himself has dismissed it as “old news,” visibly irritated when asked about it. Sean Hannity, who once built nightly shows around the “Russia hoax,” recently admitted on-air that he’s sick of even hearing Epstein’s name. That doesn’t sound like a journalist, commentator, or patriot committed to exposing one of the most insidious sex-trafficking operations in modern history.
Why?
When they do address it, a common argument made by Trump supporters is that if the President was implicated, former President Joe Biden would have released the files. That argument doesn’t hold any weight when the principle of Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.) is applied. Hypothetically, would Biden have released the files if, in addition to Trump, Biden’s son Hunter was in them as well?
It’s called being thick as thieves. Outing one means outing all.
So, why the silence? Why the fatigue? And why does it seem that political loyalties dictate whether child trafficking is a cause worth fighting? If Epstein’s ring really involved powerful men across party lines, the swamp has every reason to downplay, redact, and distract. Without relentless public demand, the Epstein files will likely follow the familiar path: sanitized, redacted, and buried.
That’s why Nick Bryant is essential. He is not just another pundit. He has spent years investigating Epstein, documenting the victims’ stories, and tracing the networks of protection that shielded him. With deep expertise and rare independence, Bryant can explain what these new files might reveal, what they are likely to conceal, and why only public pressure can break through the swamp’s instinct to cover for its own. If America wants the truth about Epstein, it will not come from the committee rooms of Washington—it will come from experts like Bryant arming the public with facts, context, and a call to action.
To schedule Nick Bryant: Todd Baumann / 512-966-0983 / Bookings@SpecialGuests.com
Nick Bryant is available now for interviews. Let’s stop ignoring the truth. Let’s talk.
Relevant Article(s):
‘Deep corruption’: Trump admin ‘kicking the can down the road’ to hide Epstein files
Optional Q&A:
- What should the American people realistically expect from the House Oversight Committee’s upcoming Epstein file release?
- How likely is it that client names will actually be exposed, given Washington’s long history of over-redaction?
- What do you make of William Barr insisting that Trump won’t be damaged by any disclosures, considering his father’s role in Epstein’s early career?
- Why do you think conservative influencers and MAGA media suddenly stopped talking about Epstein after the Turning Point weekend in July?
- How does the silence from voices like Sean Hannity—who covered the Russia “hoax” nightly—affect public momentum for truth on Epstein?
- Do you believe there’s bipartisan incentive to keep the Epstein network partially hidden, and if so, why?
- What role does public pressure play in ensuring real transparency, and what happens if the public loses interest?
- As someone who has spent years investigating Epstein, what do you see as the most overlooked piece of this scandal that the swamp wants to stay buried?
ABOUT NICK BRYANT…
Nick Bryant is an investigative journalist. He spent seven years investigating a child sex trafficking network that was covered up by state and federal authorities, culminating in The Franklin Scandal: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse, and Betrayal. The trafficking network I wrote about in The Franklin Scandal has been the focal point of considerable misinformation and/or disinformation on the Internet. Individuals who, perhaps, suffer from psychiatric disorders have woven the Illuminati and shape shifting reptilian ETs into the narrative.
But the book’s foremost transgressor has been Wikipedia. The “Franklin child prostitution ring allegations” Wikipedia page has been under siege by unscrupulous Wikipedia “editors,” and they’ve intentionally made it nonsensical.
The Franklin Scandal and the Epstein scandal are quite similar in the sense that both child trafficking networks were covered up by state and federal authorities and the mainstream media has been complicit, because it never demanded justice for the children whose lives had been disfigured. I started investigating the Epstein network in 2012, when I acquired his “Little Black Book”—seven years before the case broke nationally.
I pitched an article on the Little Black Book for three years to mainstream media outlets, but, like The Franklin Scandal, my pitches were met with unbridled skepticism and incredulity. In 2015, finally, Gawker published the Little Black Book and accompanying articles. I found it ironic that Gawker, considered to be the mean kids in the media, had the fortitude to publish a story about children whose lives have been disfigured with impunity, whereas media outlets ostensibly immersed in integrity had rejected the story.
His latest book, The Truth About Watergate: A Tale of Extraordinary Lies and Liars, details the false narrative that our history books have imparted about the infamous Watergate affair.
ABOUT PETER SHINN…
Lieutenant Colonel (Ret.) Pete Shinn has an extensive background in the U.S. Air Force as a trainer, journalist, and adult educator. He also served as an executive officer for the Continental NORAD Region Air Operations Center, and as a liaison between the Secretary of the Air Force and U.S. Senate Appropriators.
Beginning in 1989, Shinn began providing interactive diversity and inclusion training to Air Force audiences. In 2008, Shinn was selected to provide leadership, communications, problem solving, and critical thinking skills training at the U.S. Air Force Officer Training School. In 2010, he deployed with the Iowa National Guard to provide agricultural training to farmers in Afghanistan’s Kunar Province.
After returning from Afghanistan, he provided interactive training on the intersection between agriculture and national defense to a variety of organizations, including the National Agri-Marketing Association, American Farm Bureau Federation, National Pork Board, and National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, among others. Pete retired from the Air Force in October 2020 after 36 years of service. He is currently a co-creator at Shinnfluence LLC, a family media and training business.
Pete’s major military awards include the Bronze Star, the Meritorious Service Medal with three oak leaf clusters, and the U.S. Army Combat Action Badge. His major civilian awards include the 1998 Nebraska Broadcaster’s Association Gold Service to Agriculture Award, the National Association of Farm Broadcasting President’s Award in 2004 and 2005, and an Emmy Award in 2012 for Best Military Program.
To Schedule an interview with Nick, send an email to Bookings@SpecialGuests.com or call 512-966-0983
