During Interview with Rudy Giuliani about NCRI, Carolla Recognizes Who Made It Happen
***UPDATE: AUGUST 5, 2025; Link to entire interview with Rudy Giuliani:
From Rome, via the Adam Carolla Show:
Adam Carolla opened the conversation by noting that Rudy Giuliani was in Rome attending an event organized by the NCRI, introducing viewers to the setting and specifying that Special Guests Publicity had arranged the interview. Giuliani described why he had traveled to Rome, citing international concern around Iran’s political climate and the perceived need to raise awareness of resistance efforts on a global stage. Carolla steered the dialogue into a discussion about the conference’s goals and the role of NCRI in advocating against Iran’s ruling regime.
Giuliani reflected on how the NCRI conference serves as a focal point for diaspora voices and political exiles who aim to confront Iran’s regime. He framed the gathering as more than symbolic—he saw it as an opportunity to amplify voices that are often marginalized, to challenge state-sponsored persecution, and to draw attention from Western policymakers. He discussed the logistical and political hurdles of organizing such events outside Iran’s sphere of influence, describing Rome as a key venue due to its symbolic and diplomatic significance.
Carolla interjected to ask about Giuliani’s own motivations and what he believes Western audiences should take away from international resistance conferences. Giuliani reiterated that these meetings are about awareness and accountability. He emphasized the importance of media coverage and international diplomatic pressure, painting the NCRI platform as a vehicle for transparency and advocacy rather than traditional activism.
The conversation shifted toward Giuliani’s assessment of what he called the “deep state” influence—how entrenched bureaucrats and intelligence agencies alleged to shape policy regardless of administrations. Giuliani positioned his trip to Rome as part of a broader effort to expose what he perceives as institutional resistance to challenging Iran’s power structures. He argued that building public support via high‑profile conferences and public statements could counterbalance internal inertia in intelligence and policy apparatuses.
Carolla asked about potential consequences for Giuliani himself—would speaking through NCRI-affiliated forums draw criticism or expose him to political risk? Giuliani acknowledged the possibility but framed it as a necessary trade-off, arguing that confronting what he described as corrupt or opaque systems was more important than personal repercussions. He positioned his public persona as a voice willing to take that risk.
At one point, Carolla prompted Giuliani to address how this conference and broader opposition efforts relate to current geopolitical situations. Giuliani then turned to global leadership behaviors, criticizing what he saw as inconsistency in policy from Western governments. He argued that European and American leadership hesitated to take firm stands because of economic and diplomatic concerns, which he described as weakness exploited by authoritarian regimes. He expressed hope that sustained pressure through civil society and diaspora networks, such as NCRI, could compel change even when governments are reluctant.
Toward the end, Carolla asked Giuliani for personal reflections: how such events influence public narratives, and whether he believed genuine momentum could be built outside of official diplomatic channels. Giuliani responded that platforms like NCRI’s conferences are essential in shaping public understanding—especially in contexts where journalists or analysts may face restrictions or lack access. He emphasized that receiving international attention can legitimize resistance movements, attract media coverage, and exert pressure—regardless of whether governments publicly acknowledge them.
Finally, the pair turned toward Russia and former President Trump. Giuliani shared his perspective on allegations that Putin preferred Trump over Kamala Harris—and how those narratives played into broader discussions about foreign interference and intelligence assessments. He assessed those claims in the context of his broader analysis on influence operations and media framing. Carolla wrapped up by revisiting the importance of continuing to spotlight what Giuliani called “deep state dynamics,” suggesting that external advocacy can reveal layers that official channels often gloss over.
Throughout the exchange, the moderator’s tone was conversational but pointed—Carolla pressed for clarity on the why and how of Giuliani’s engagement with NCRI content, while Giuliani framed the conversation around themes of resistance, transparency, accountability, and public awareness. Even without specific quotes, the flow of the discussion made clear that both men saw value in bringing attention to dissident voices against Iran’s regime, believing that exposure and sustained visibility are essential in challenging institutional and governmental reluctance.
In closing, Giuliani reiterated his belief that organized resistance events in cities like Rome can influence global discourse and rally support—even if indirectly—by shining light where secrecy and power intersect. Carolla’s final remarks underscored that the interview was a rare, direct engagement with those ideas under the aegis of Special Guests Publicity, and that it served as a vehicle to question hidden structures and emphasize citizen-led clarity above official opacity.
