The Allahmo: Members of Designated Terrorist Organization in Texas now Get to Vote
As early voting begins in Texas, one ballot measure stands out not as a routine state policy question but as a pivotal moment in the preservation of constitutional order: Proposition 10, which is about whether Texas should BAN Sharia Law. This is not abstract symbolism — it’s a grassroots response to what many national security experts describe as the creeping influence of sharia-supremacist ideology and its potential to erode foundational legal principles across America.
Close to this, quite literally, is Frank Gaffney — founder of the Center for Security Policy and a leading voice on ideological threats to Western legal systems — warned that “the enemy gets a vote” in Texas unless patriots turn out to affirm Proposition 10. Under Texas’s open primary system, Democrats, independents, and other non-Republican voters can influence the outcome, meaning that opponents of robust legal defenses against sharia may tilt the results if pro-Constitution voters do not mobilize in force.
Complicating all of this are allegations that Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s biggest donor is a Pakistani Muslim named Syed Javaid Anwar. Over the last two years, 50 mosques have opened up in the DFW area.
Gaffney argues that the risks extend well beyond one Lone Star ballot box. Sharia is not merely a personal set of religious beliefs but a comprehensive legal system that, if allowed to operate within the U.S. legal framework, could challenge constitutional protections for free speech, individual rights, property rights, and due process. This concern has animated the broader “Save Texas, Save America” campaign, which seeks to clearly define sharia’s incompatibility with the U.S. Constitution and to build national momentum off Texas’s example.
Proposition 10 is anchored in the Texas GOP’s assertion that American law, and only American law, must govern disputes and civic life in the state. Supporters say this prevents any foreign or religious legal code from overriding constitutional rights, a position that resonates with grassroots voters worried about confusion, legal conflict, or special-interest inroads into state legal processes.
Critics dismiss the measure as unnecessary or discriminatory, but Gaffney’s analysis situates it squarely within a strategic defense of constitutional sovereignty — a bulwark against ideological subversion at a time when legal systems worldwide are being tested by competing normative orders.
Frank Gaffney is available to discuss: what Proposition 10 would actually do if it passes; how sharia-supremacist organizations could exploit legal ambiguities; why early voting turnout matters; and what this vote means for the future of the constitutional rule of law in Texas and across the United States.
The moment is here. The stakes could not be higher.
Relevant Article(s):
The Anti-Constitutional Character Of Sharia – Ban Sharia
OPTIONAL Q&A
- How does Proposition 10 move beyond symbolism and actually block sharia law from gaining legal footholds in Texas?
- Why do you warn that “the enemy gets a vote” in this primary, and who specifically is the enemy in this context?
- What legal or constitutional vulnerabilities exist if sharia is allowed to operate informally through arbitration or community pressure?
- Why should Americans outside Texas care about a single state ballot proposition?
- How have sharia-supremacist groups historically exploited Western legal tolerance to advance their objectives?
- What role do organizations like CAIR play in opposing measures such as Proposition 10?
- Why do critics claim these bans are unnecessary, and what are they ignoring or deliberately downplaying?
- If Proposition 10 fails, what precedent does that set for other states and for the country as a whole?
ABOUT FRANK GAFFNEY…
Frank J. Gaffney is the President of the Institute for the American Future. He acted as President Reagan’s Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy and served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Forces and Arms Control Policy. Mr. Gaffney founded and led for thirty-seven years the Center for Security Policy. He is the host of “Securing America with Frank Gaffney” on the Real America’s Voice network and the co-author of The Indictment: Prosecuting the Chinese Communist Party and Friends for Crimes Against America, China and the World.
Websites:
www.CenterForSecurityPolicy.org
CONTACT: Todd Baumann of Special Guests Publicity
512-966-0983 / Bookings@SpecialGuests.com
