Patsy Protocol: From Oswald to Robinson, the “Lone Nut” Script Keeps Delivering Sequels
There always seems to be a man ready to take the fall. A face for the cameras. A name for the headlines. A story that settles everything before anyone has time to ask the wrong questions. From Dallas in 1963 to today, the pattern is as old as politics itself: find the “lone wolf,” flood the media, seal the files, and dare anyone to doubt it. Now, as questions swirl around Tyler Robinson, the public is being asked — once again — to accept a perfectly wrapped narrative that feels less like justice and more like choreography.
What happens when one of the most respected medical-forensic researchers in the JFK assassination and the nephew of an LBJ whistleblower examine modern political violence together?
Dr. David Mantik, MD, PhD — whose decades of forensic research have challenged the official JFK narrative and argued that Lee Harvey Oswald was a “patsy” — is now raising urgent questions about the Charlie Kirk assassination case. Mantik points to troubling behavioral and procedural similarities between the Oswald case and the treatment of accused gunman Tyler Robinson, suggesting that Robinson may also be a constructed fall guy rather than the true architect of the crime.
Also available is Bob Nelson, whose family history places him at the center of one of the most explosive backstories in American political history. Nelson’s uncle was actively testifying against Lyndon B. Johnson before Congress on the very day JFK was killed — a fact Nelson has documented through personal archives and sworn testimony records. For Nelson, the “patsy” concept is not theoretical; it is embedded in family history.
Together, Mantik and Nelson pose a question mainstream media refuses to explore:
If Oswald was framed, and if Robinson shows signs of being framed, what does that imply about the real authors of political assassinations?
Their collaboration does not present conspiracy as conclusion — it presents evidence patterns, behavioral anomalies, and historical symmetry that deserve professional investigation. Mantik brings clinical, forensic discipline to the table, analyzing inconsistencies in how narratives are constructed around lone suspects. Nelson brings a rare historical through-line, connecting institutional power structures across generations.
This isn’t fringe speculation. It is an expert-driven inquiry into a recurring pattern:
– Rapid narrative closure
– Convenient lone gunmen
– Suppressed testimony
– And institutional resistance to deeper review
The story isn’t “who did it” — it’s why the public is always given the same storyline.
A joint interview with Dr. Mantik and Bob Nelson offers audiences something rare: a disciplined, fact-driven challenge to official passivity, asking the question journalists are supposed to ask — cui bono?
If Tyler Robinson is not the real centerpiece of the story, then who is?
And who benefits from Americans never being allowed to ask?
Relevant Article(s):
Charlie Kirk’s Killer Tyler Robinson Branded A ‘Patsy’ By Expert — FBI Suspects Conspiracy
Books by Mantik
Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis
OPTIONAL Q&A:
- If Lee Harvey Oswald was a patsy, what specific indicators in that case most clearly exposed him as one?
- What behavioral or procedural red flags in the Tyler Robinson case mirror what you saw in the JFK narrative?
- How can experts distinguish between a genuine lone actor and a manufactured scapegoat?
- What role does rushed narrative closure play in preventing real accountability after political violence?
- Why do so many high-profile cases rely on convenient, psychologically unstable “lone suspects”?
- What historical patterns suggest that institutional protection mechanisms activate after politically sensitive killings?
- If Tyler Robinson were being framed, what evidence would investigators deliberately suppress or manipulate?
- Who typically benefits when the public is discouraged from questioning official conclusions in assassination cases?
ABOUT DR. DAVID MANTIK…
An M.D. and Ph.D., David Mantik spent many years in private practice in Rancho Mirage/Palm Desert, California. More recently, he became a peripatetic radiation oncologist. He is currently licensed in eight states and has also worked in Hawaii and New Zealand.
In his spare time, Mantik writes about the JFK assassination and has made some amazing discoveries. He spent nine full days at the National Archives to view (and perform measurements on) the JFK autopsy X-rays, the autopsy photographs, JFK’s clothing and the ballistic artifacts. So, we now know that the Warren Commission was not very interested in the truth, but that indifference still seems to afflict Washington, DC. In 2024, Mantik co-authored the book, The Final Analysis with Dr. Jerome Corsi.
Visit www.TheMantikView.org
ABOUT BOB NELSON…
Nephew of Don B. (Buck) Reynolds, who gave testimony on Lyndon Johnson on November 22, 1963. Nelson’s book, LBJ’S Mortal Wound, the Don Reynolds Story, is available from Trine Day Publications; website: LBJ’S Mortal Wound.
Reynolds was delivering testimony to Congress that would be very damaging to LBJ. Then, the assassination. Though it was likely very difficult for Reynolds to testify against the Vice President, he suddenly found himself in the position of testifying against the President.
Nelson has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Illinois, Champaign; and received a master’s degree from the American Graduate School of International Management, Glendale, Arizona.
He has a marketing background with Unisys Corporation; and research experience with the University of Wisconsin Survey Center.
LBJ’S MORTAL WOUND: THE DON REYNOLDS STORY: THE PRESIDENT, THE BOBBY B – TrineDay
https://jfklancer.maryferrell.org/pdf/LBJ-Reynolds.pdf
For Interviews, call or Text 512-966-0983 or send an email to Bookings@SpecialGuests.com
Patsy Cline ain’t got nothin on Patsy Oswald or Patsy Tyler.
Patsy Cake, Patsy Cake
