NCRI’s Shahin Gobadi and Ali Safavi discuss future of Iran after the bombing of Iran’s Nuclear Sites
In the days following the targeted strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, Shahin Gobadi and Ali Safavi, representatives of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), appeared on the John B. Wells Show Ark Midnight on June 28, 2025, to discuss the implications of these events and the future prospects for Iran. Their conversation focused on the broader geopolitical context, the internal dynamics within Iran, and the strategic significance of the recent military actions.
Gobadi and Safavi began by framing the strikes as a decisive move that disrupted a critical component of the Iranian regime’s capacity to develop nuclear weapons. They underscored that the regime’s nuclear program was never simply about energy or civilian use but was primarily aimed at securing a nuclear arsenal to maintain power and exert influence in the region. By targeting these facilities, the international community sent a clear message that nuclear ambitions would not be tolerated. The disruption was expected to have both immediate tactical effects and longer-term strategic consequences for Tehran’s military and political calculations.
The two NCRI spokesmen then highlighted the internal pressures facing the Iranian regime. They noted that economic hardship, widespread corruption, and relentless repression have fueled growing dissatisfaction among ordinary Iranians. Gobadi and Safavi stressed that this popular unrest is not new but has been steadily increasing over years of protest and civil resistance. The strikes, in their view, further weaken the regime’s hold on power and embolden the Iranian people in their long-standing struggle for freedom and democracy.
They also emphasized that the regime’s destabilizing actions in the Middle East—support for proxy militias, involvement in regional conflicts, and efforts to spread its influence—have made it a source of insecurity not only for Iran’s neighbors but for the world at large. The removal of key nuclear infrastructure limits Tehran’s ability to threaten its adversaries and supports the NCRI’s vision of a peaceful, democratic Iran.
Gobadi and Safavi discussed the importance of international support for the Iranian resistance movement, noting that diplomatic and economic pressure must continue alongside direct actions. They advocated for coordinated sanctions and a firm stance to prevent the regime from regaining nuclear capabilities or increasing its regional aggression. However, they cautioned that military strikes alone would not be sufficient to bring about regime change; the Iranian people must remain the central force in shaping the country’s future.
The interview also explored the NCRI’s ten-point plan for a democratic Iran, which includes the establishment of a secular, non-nuclear republic that respects human rights, promotes gender equality, and guarantees autonomy for Iran’s diverse ethnic groups. Gobadi and Safavi asserted that the NCRI’s leadership and its supporters inside Iran are ready to step in and lead the country toward a new, inclusive political order once the current regime’s power is broken.
They addressed concerns about possible retaliatory measures from Tehran, acknowledging that the regime might respond aggressively in the short term but emphasizing that its capacity to inflict damage would be diminished without nuclear weapons. They also suggested that the international community should be prepared for increased attempts by the regime to sow chaos and distraction but remain steadfast in their support for the Iranian people.
Throughout the discussion, Gobadi and Safavi expressed cautious optimism that the combination of military pressure, international isolation, and sustained domestic resistance could create a turning point in Iran’s history. They emphasized that the people of Iran, who have endured decades of repression, are ready to reclaim their country and build a society based on freedom, democracy, and justice.
The interview concluded with a call for continued awareness and support from the global community. Gobadi and Safavi reiterated that while the nuclear strikes represent a significant development, the ultimate outcome depends on the perseverance of the Iranian people and the international community’s commitment to their cause. The future of Iran, they asserted, hinges on the possibility of a regime change led by the people themselves, one that would usher in peace and stability for the region and the world.
Ask ChatGPTTools
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
