El Shaddai Pastor Joins Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer (Ret.) to discuss Trump Pledge to Take Over Gaza
During a recent interview on Newsmax’s National Report, Mark Biltz, founder of El Shaddai Ministries, and Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer (Ret.), a former intelligence officer, analyzed Donald Trump’s claim regarding Gaza and what it could mean in the context of biblical prophecy, U.S. foreign policy, and regional stability.
Trump’s Position on Gaza
Former President Donald Trump has been vocal about his support for Israel and his stance against the establishment of a Palestinian state that threatens Israeli sovereignty. His latest claim regarding Gaza—and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict—has sparked debates among political and religious leaders alike.
During the Newsmax segment, Lt. Col. Shaffer emphasized how Trump’s foreign policy was a major shift from previous administrations, focusing on strength through deterrence. Under the Abraham Accords, the Trump administration fostered unprecedented diplomatic relations between Israel and Arab nations. However, Shaffer warned that current U.S. policy under Biden lacks the same level of deterrence, which has emboldened Iran and its proxies in the region.
Shaffer noted that Trump’s approach to Gaza and Israel differed fundamentally from that of previous presidents. While many Western leaders have pushed for a two-state solution, Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s undivided capital and cut funding to Palestinian groups linked to terrorism. His stance on Gaza follows this pattern—rejecting international pressure to divide Israeli land and reinforcing Israel’s right to defend itself.
Biblical Prophecy and Gaza
Mark Biltz provided a biblical perspective, discussing the significance of Gaza in biblical prophecy. He referenced scriptures where Gaza is depicted as a place of conflict and judgment, particularly in relation to Israel’s future and God’s promises to the Jewish people.
Biltz highlighted how Trump’s policies align with biblical prophecy in that they support Israel’s sovereignty and oppose efforts to divide the land. He cited passages from Zechariah and Amos, which speak of God’s judgment on nations that try to take Israel’s land. According to Biltz, any modern political effort to remove Gaza from Israeli control could have spiritual consequences.
He further explained that the historical context of Gaza reveals a pattern of conflict between Israel and its adversaries, dating back to the time of the Philistines. He noted that even today, Gaza remains a stronghold of Hamas, an Iran-backed terror organization committed to Israel’s destruction.
The Current U.S. Policy and Its Consequences
Both Shaffer and Biltz agreed that Biden’s approach to the Middle East has weakened America’s influence and invited greater conflict.
Shaffer warned that the Biden administration’s attempts to appease Iran—through weak enforcement of sanctions and diplomatic overtures—have directly contributed to the destabilization of the region. He argued that a lack of firm leadership in Washington has emboldened Iran’s proxies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.
Biltz pointed out that the U.S. has a history of pushing Israel into dangerous peace deals that ultimately backfire. He argued that the Bible warns against forcing Israel into land concessions, as seen in past negotiations that led to increased terror attacks.
What’s Next for Gaza?
As violence continues in the Middle East and global powers debate Gaza’s future, both Biltz and Shaffer stressed that Trump’s position offers a stark contrast to the current administration’s policies.
Shaffer called for a return to policies that prioritize U.S. national security interests, including strengthening Israel’s military capabilities and holding Iran accountable.
Biltz urged Christians to pay attention to biblical prophecy and to support Israel through prayer and political action. He warned that decisions regarding Gaza are not just political but have spiritual consequences as well.
Conclusion
The interview on Newsmax’s National Report provided a compelling discussion on Trump’s claim to Gaza, the failures of current U.S. policy, and the biblical implications of Israel’s future. Both Shaffer and Biltz agreed that America must return to a policy of strength and support for Israel, or risk further instability and divine consequences.
As the 2024 election looms, Trump’s stance on Israel and Gaza will likely remain a key issue, especially for conservatives, national security experts, and faith-based voters who see his policies as aligned with both strategic stability and biblical prophecy.
