Associate Director of Epstein Justice Explores the latest developments in the Epstein Scandal
Interview Starts at the 1:43:06 Mark
Peter Shinn, Associate Director of Epstein Justice, joined John B. Wells on Caravan to Midnight for a deeply revealing conversation about ongoing efforts to bring accountability to the Epstein scandal. Shinn brought insider insight into how Epstein Justice, a grassroots advocacy and legal support organization, continues to press for transparency and justice long after mainstream media and political leaders have moved on.
The interview took place against the backdrop of lingering questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct, network, and apparent immunity. Shinn began by outlining Epstein Justice’s mission: helping survivors access court resources, amplifying their stories, and pushing for the full release of case files, testimonies, and communications involving Epstein, his powerful associates, and the institutions that enabled him. The organization works tirelessly to ensure the survivors aren’t forgotten, and that the full truth comes to light.
Shinn explained that their advocacy remains urgent. Despite Epstein’s death in 2019, key documents remain under seal, and powerful individuals continue to evade scrutiny. He described the recent revelations about people like Donald Trump and Bill Clinton appearing in Epstein’s black book as headline-making—but only part of a much larger cover-up. The black book is symbolic of the wider files—flight logs, payment records, text messages—that would reveal a broader web of complicity and enable law enforcement to pursue justice more aggressively. He emphasized that the moment the public gets access to the full contents, it will become clear that this scandal goes far beyond what has already been reported.
Wells asked about the recent narrative claiming that Epstein died by suicide and those aiming to shut the story down. Shinn responded by detailing Epstein Justice’s challenges with institutions like the Department of Justice and federal courts, where survivors must navigate legal obstacles and bureaucratic delays. He described how attempts to secure document releases are met with procedural stalls and secrecy, reinforcing the impression that justice is being withheld deliberately to protect influential people.
The conversation shifted to the role of mainstream media. Shinn expressed frustration that despite the scale of Epstein’s crimes and the number of survivors seeking justice, the story fades whenever powerful actors are implicated. He pointed out that headlines tend to focus on shock-value moments—such as arrests or celebrity ties—but rarely stay long enough to track the systemic issues or push for litigation that could force disclosure. He made a compelling case for independent watchdogs, alternative media, and survivor-led organizations to keep the momentum alive.
John B. Wells pressed him on solutions. Shinn said Epstein Justice is working on several fronts: supporting strategic litigation aimed at releasing sealed documents, lobbying for legislation that limits gag orders and expands survivors’ rights, and coordinating with international advocates pursuing investigations outside the U.S. He stressed the importance of cross-border alliances, especially given Epstein’s alleged activities and assets beyond American jurisdiction. He also praised the determination of survivors, who are increasingly uniting and connecting with attorneys ready to challenge institutional secrecy.
The interview concluded with Shinn outlining a roadmap for the public. He urges people to write to congressional representatives, demanding hearings on Epstein-related material. He invites journalists and filmmakers to collaborate with Epstein Justice to shine a brighter light on hidden records. And he calls on everyday citizens to stay engaged, reminding them that public pressure can tip the balance. The fight, he made clear, isn’t only legal—but moral, civic, and enduring.
Shinn’s message throughout was unapologetic: the Epstein scandal is far from over. The fight for truth and justice is ongoing and requires sustained attention, advocacy, and political courage. The raw scale of institutional failings—overlapping federal agencies, political figures, judicial reluctance—exposes a systemic problem that reverberates well beyond Epstein. But he also conveyed optimism: with survivor leadership, strategic legal action, international solidarity, and public engagement, the doors to sealed files can still be forced open.
By the end, it was evident that Epstein Justice isn’t a sideshow—it’s a reckoning in progress. As John B. Wells closed the segment, the call to action was clear: this story won’t die until survivors see full disclosure, and justice no longer bows to privilege and power.
