Harvard University Goes to the Mat Over Diversity and Gets Schooled
Dr. Katherine Albrecht, a Harvard-educated privacy expert and cultural critic, is available to comment on the federal government’s unprecedented decision to freeze over $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to Harvard University—a move triggered by Harvard’s refusal to dismantle diversity programs and limit student protests, as demanded by the Trump administration.
In a bold April 14 letter, Harvard President Alan Garber asserted that the university “will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.” Hours later, the Department of Education’s anti-Semitism task force retaliated with the funding freeze, accusing Harvard of harboring an “entitlement mindset” and failing to uphold civil rights.
Dr. Albrecht sees this moment as a constitutional and cultural inflection point. “Universities have no right to funds and if the taxpayers put stipulations on those funds, the university receiving them must comply. In this case, taxpayers do not approve of DEI programs.”
As a Harvard alumna who has long criticized institutional overreach—both from the government and within academia—Dr. Albrecht can speak to the irony of a federal demand for “viewpoint diversity” enforced through ideological mandates and coerced compliance. She warns that this growing federal campaign risks creating a two-tiered academic system: one that rewards political obedience and punishes intellectual independence.
“If Harvard is being strong-armed into silencing voices under the guise of fighting discrimination,” she argues, “then academic freedom is in crisis—and every university in America should be paying close attention.”
With Harvard facing an August 2025 deadline and billions in funding on the line, Dr. Albrecht offers a principled, constitutionalist perspective—rooted in her Ivy League education and years of advocacy for freedom of thought and expression.
Dr. Albrecht is available for interviews, op-eds, and expert commentary.
Relevant Article(s):
OPTIONAL Q&A
- As a Harvard alumna, what was your immediate reaction to the federal government freezing billions in funding over the university’s refusal to comply with the administration’s demands?
- You’ve long warned about government overreach—do you see this move as an attempt to enforce ideological conformity under the guise of civil rights enforcement?
- Harvard says it won’t “surrender its independence or constitutional rights.” Do you believe the university is genuinely defending free speech, or protecting selective speech?
- Some argue that the government’s demand for “viewpoint diversity” sounds noble—but is it just censorship in sheep’s clothing?
- The administration has targeted DEI programs, face coverings at protests, and even hiring criteria. Are these reforms protecting civil rights—or weaponizing them?
- What precedent does this set for other universities? Could this become a slippery slope toward federal control over academic content and culture?
- Critics say elite schools like Harvard are “entitled” and out of touch. But should federal money come with the power to dictate campus values?
- If you were advising Harvard’s leadership right now, how would you respond to these demands—fight back, find middle ground, or fold under pressure?
ABOUT DR. KATHERINE ALBRECHT…
Albrecht is an internationally known privacy researcher, consumer advocate, bestselling author, and nationally syndicated radio host. She is also a senior executive with the private email company StartMail that makes powerful encryption tools available for regular people. Katherine holds a Doctorate in Human Development and Consumer Education from Harvard University, has studied at the MIT Media lab, and received a Masters from Harvard in Technology, Innovation, and Education.
Katherine has authored pro-consumer legislation, testified before the Federal Trade Commission, provided expert testimony to numerous state legislatures, and was appointed as a consumer technology expert by NH Governor John Lynch. She has advised the European Commission and been invited to speak before advocacy groups, bar associations, and government assemblies around the world. She co-authored the bestselling book Spychips which exposed corporate plans to misuse RFID technology and brought about much-needed consumer privacy reforms across the retail industry, and she was a plaintiff in a pivotal first amendment case guaranteeing activists the right to free speech in the nation’s convention centers (Albrecht v. Metropolitan Pier Exposition Auth.).
Katherine has granted over 2,000 media interviews with news outlets around the globe, including CBS, NBC, CNN, NPR, Fox News, Good Morning America, the BBC, Wired Magazine, The New York Times, and hundreds more. Katherine has written articles for numerous publications, including Scientific American and the Denver Law Review, and she is a former Associate Editor of the IEEE Technology & Society Magazine.
CONTACT: Todd Baumann of Special Guests Publicity 512-966-0983 / Bookings@SpecialGuests.com
