Ebola Baloney: Biochemist and Cancer Expert says Ebola Virus just another Processed Narrative
As headlines once again fill with warnings about a growing Ebola outbreak in Central Africa, renewed airport screenings, emergency health measures, and fears of international spread, Dr. David Rasnick is offering a radically different interpretation of the crisis. While governments, public health agencies, and the medical establishment describe Ebola as a deadly viral threat requiring urgent intervention, Rasnick argues that the underlying assumptions behind the outbreak narrative are fundamentally flawed. In fact, he contends that Ebola itself is not what the public has been told it is—a position that places him among the most controversial critics of modern virology.
- Challenges mainstream explanations for Ebola, COVID, and other outbreaks
- Claims medical protocols worsened outcomes during the pandemic
- Questions the existence of viruses as commonly understood
- Criticizes pharmaceutical influence on public health decision-making
- Offers a controversial alternative view of infectious disease science
For decades, Rasnick challenged prevailing assumptions in medicine.
Today, Rasnick argues that much of what the public has been told about infectious disease is fundamentally wrong. His views have made him a target of fierce criticism from the medical establishment, but they have also attracted a growing audience eager to hear perspectives that refute what they believe are dishonest narratives with agendas not in the best interest of the public good.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Rasnick publicly disputed the accepted narrative surrounding the virus. He contends that COVID-19 was misidentified and that many illnesses attributed to the pandemic were actually cases of influenza and other conditions relabeled under a new diagnosis. He further argues that government policies, wrong-headed incentives, misdiagnoses, hospital protocols, and pharmaceutical interventions contributed significantly to excess deaths.
Among his most controversial claims are his criticisms of ventilator use and drugs such as Remdesivir, which he believes caused unnecessary harm. Rasnick maintains that fear, bureaucratic decision-making, and financial incentives combined to produce medical outcomes that were often worse than the diseases being treated.
Yet his skepticism extends far beyond COVID.
Rasnick questions the very foundation of modern virology, arguing that many pathogens commonly described as viruses have never been properly demonstrated to exist as claimed. Whether the discussion involves Ebola, Hantavirus, HIV, COVID-19, or virtually any other virus that has dominated headlines, Rasnick frequently reaches conclusions that stand in stark contrast to those accepted by governments, pharmaceutical companies, public health agencies, and much of the scientific community.
Before accepting that as a reason to discredit him, look for common threads that run through all of those entities.
His critics describe his views as dangerous. His supporters see him as a scientist willing to challenge powerful institutions and ask questions others refuse to entertain.
Few guests are capable of generating a more provocative conversation about public health, medicine, scientific consensus, censorship, and the influence of corporate interests on healthcare policy. Whether audiences agree with him or not, Rasnick forces listeners to confront assumptions that most people rarely examine.
If your audience is interested in exploring controversial scientific debates, questioning accepted narratives, and hearing arguments that have largely been excluded from mainstream discussion, Dr. David Rasnick offers a perspective unlike almost any other guest. Expect a lively discussion about viruses, pandemics, public health policy, cancer research, and the limits of scientific consensus in an age increasingly defined by institutional trust—or the lack of it.
Relevant Article(s):
WHO chief in Congo’s Bunia as Ebola outbreak escalates | AP News
Americans exposed to Ebola in Africa will be sent to Kenya for care, Trump administration says | CNN
OPTIONAL Q&A:
- As Ebola once again dominates international headlines, why do you reject the conventional explanation for Ebola outbreaks, and what do you believe is actually occurring?
- You have argued that COVID-19 was not a novel viral pandemic. What evidence led you to that conclusion, and what do you believe caused the illnesses attributed to COVID?
- Many families lost loved ones during the pandemic. Why do you believe hospital protocols, including ventilator use and certain drug treatments, contributed to those deaths?
- You have said that Remdesivir caused more harm than good. What are your primary criticisms of the drug and how it was deployed during the pandemic?
- Your views extend beyond COVID to viruses generally. What is the strongest evidence, in your view, that challenges the existence of viruses as they are commonly understood?
- You have raised similar objections regarding Ebola, Hantavirus, HIV, and other pathogens. What common thread do you see connecting these diseases and the narratives surrounding them?
- Critics argue that your position conflicts with decades of scientific research. How do you respond to those who say your conclusions are unsupported by the available evidence?
- If your understanding of disease and virology is correct, what changes would you make to modern medicine, public health policy, and the way future outbreaks are investigated?
ABOUT DAVID RASNICK…
David Rasnick has a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. In 1996, he joined Peter Duesberg at the University of California at Berkeley, where they proved the hundred-year-old theory that unbalanced chromosomes cause cancer. He was a named contributing editor to explosive book by Robert F. Kennedy, JR. The Real Anthony Fauci.
For nearly two decades, Rasnick developed inhibitors of enzymes responsible for the tissue destruction caused by arthritis, emphysema, parasites, and cancer. His 2012 book, The Chromosomal Imbalance Theory of Cancer: Autocatalyzed Progression of Aneuploidy is Carcinogenesis, is for cancer researchers. His new book, The Outsider’s Advantage: A Personal Odyssey into the Essence of Cancer, tells the same story but in plain language and in the context of his decades-long journey as an outsider. TO SCHEDULE AN INTERVIEW, CALL OR TEXT 512-966-0983 OR EMAIL BOOKINGS@SPECIALGUESTS.COM
