At Home Abortions are Something that BOTH SIDES of Charged Debate Can Agree is a Bad Idea
Some models just do not work when applied to different situations. Prior to Amazon and even the COVID lockdowns, consumers went to a physical store, like SEARS of JC Penny’s to make purchases. The Amazon model allows for the convenience of having those products delivered to your home.
There is now a market for the same model to be applied to women seeking abortions. This is highly unsafe for the women, which is a major rallying cry for the pro-choice crowd. Their stated moral high ground is safety for the women, above that of the unborn.
Tacara McKay, Communications Director for Let Them Live explains how this should allow pro-life and pro-choice factions to each find common moral high ground.
In Lancaster County, a mother allegedly used abortion medication obtained from the internet, leading to the discovery of a baby’s remains buried in a box.
The baby’s cause of death was determined to be extreme prematurity prior to viability, though the manner of death remains undetermined.
Authorities are investigating, but no charges have been filed at this time.
Even Planned Parenthood is expressing concern about this practice and is advising against it. Is it doing so because at-home abortions represent a new market that will crowd the abortion provider out, like Walmart did with small business models? Do Planned Parenthood advocates see this as bad optics for the pro-choice side?
On one level, it doesn’t matter. Everyone in the abortion debate can agree on this one issue. And that’s a start.
Both pro-life and pro-choice perspectives can agree on the need for oversight, providing a unique angle for a balanced, informed discussion.
Schedule an interview with Tacara McKay today!
Related Article(s):
Planned Parenthood discusses dangers of using medicine purchased online for at-home abortion
OPTIONAL Q&A
- Why do you believe at-home abortions present a unique opportunity for both pro-life and pro-choice advocates to find common ground?
- What are the biggest risks associated with at-home abortions, and why should women on both sides of the debate be concerned?
- How does the case in Lancaster County illustrate the dangers of unregulated abortion access through online sources?
- Planned Parenthood has voiced concerns about at-home abortions—do you think this is a genuine safety concern, or is it more about maintaining their role in the abortion industry?
- What role should lawmakers and medical professionals play in regulating or preventing at-home abortions?
- How does the shift to at-home abortions reflect a broader trend in the abortion industry, and what does it mean for the future of the debate?
- Some argue that restricting access to at-home abortion pills infringes on women’s rights. How do you respond to that perspective?
- If both pro-life and pro-choice advocates agree that at-home abortions are dangerous, what steps should be taken to address the issue effectively?
ABOUT TACARA MCKAY…
Tacara McKay is a passionate and dedicated communications professional currently serving as the Public Relations Manager for Let Them Live, a non-profit organization providing vital support to mothers facing crisis pregnancies. As a mother of three, Tacara deeply understands the importance of nurturing and protecting life, a personal conviction that fuels her commitment to the pro-life cause.
Prior to her role at Let Them Live, Tacara demonstrated her dedication to service as a Marine. Her commitment to advocating for the vulnerable led her to collaborate with pro-life organizations to expose corrupt abortion clinics in Michigan. Leveraging her expertise in social media and public relations, Tacara is a vocal pro-life activist, utilizing her platform to raise awareness and inspire action in defense of the unborn.
Her unique perspective as a mother, a former Marine, and a seasoned communications professional makes her a compelling voice on issues related to women’s health, pregnancy support, and the pro-life movement. Tacara is available to discuss the work of Let Them Live, the challenges faced by women in crisis pregnancies, and the broader landscape of the pro-life movement.
ABOUT EMILY BERNING…
Emily Berning is the President and Co-Founder of Let Them Live, a 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to saving lives from abortion by financially supporting women in crisis pregnancies. She has been involved with the pro-life movement for over 8 years and her greatest passion in life is giving pregnant women the support they need to choose life. Emily holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Biology from Colorado State University and met her husband, Nathan, the summer after she graduated. They started Let Them Live together in 2018 and have grown it to a team of 50 staff and 100+ volunteers that has helped almost 1000 women cancel their abortions and choose life. Emily and Nathan love working together and recently wrote a book about their experiences with Let Them Live that released in the fall of 2023: “Let Them Live: How Saving One Life from Abortion Sparked a Movement”
ABOUT NATHAN BERNING…
Co-Founder & Executive Director of Let them Live. Nathan’s organization has saved over 1000 babies by removing financial barriers to life, raising millions of dollars in donations via remote crowd funding. Implemented fully remote model, which connected donors with mothers in crisis. Nathan did this by using real-time data tracking and digital case management. Worked with Dr. Ben Carson and his senior staff to refine the campaign’s national message, raising candidate visibility among conservative and faith-based constituencies. Nathan is a pro-life innovator and grassroots advocate with a proven capacity to deploy technology, messaging, and policy for transformative social impact. Rare combination of a background in Silicon Valley entrepreneurship and a pro-life message. Nathan’s website is www.LetThemLive.org
