Trump’s ‘Old News’ Comment to Epstein Question Blindsides Reporter, Rattles Attorney General in Facepalm Moment
President Donald Trump doesn’t want to talk about Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, he won’t let anyone talk about it. Brook Urick has seen the underbelly of this very twisted world firsthand and insists it MUST be talked about.
At a recent press conference, a reporter asked AG Pam Bondi about Epstein — a fair, overdue question considering Bondi’s ties and Epstein’s ties to everyone. But before she could speak, Trump cut her off and sneered, “That’s old news.” He wasn’t just dodging — he was shutting it down.
Urick is available now for interviews to unpack what this disturbing moment really signals — and why the reaction to it is even more revealing.
Trump’s bizarre outburst is fueling a wave of cognitive dissonance within the MAGA base. These are the same people who chant “Save the Children,” rage against the Deep State, and demand truth about Epstein. Now they’re watching their guy slam the brakes on one of the most important and unresolved scandals of our time — and they’re starting to ask questions.
Trump’s defenders are scrambling. Conservative media is running for cover. And MAGA diehards are caught in a psychological tug-of-war: do they stick with the man who said he’d drain the swamp — or do they admit that maybe, just maybe, he’s protecting part of it?
Most in the conservative media won’t touch this story and, if they do, it’s only briefly and around the edges. More important, they’re not demanding answers with a steady, daily drumbeat. They’re afraid of being deplatformed, blacklisted, or accused of “helping the left.” But Brook Urick doesn’t play by those rules. She’s fearless, informed, and more than willing to go where others won’t — straight into the heart of the cover-up.
If your outlet wants to break through the noise and take on the issue conservative media refuses to confront, Brook Urick is the voice you want. She’s ready to call out the hypocrisy, the silence, and the mind games — all of it.
Epstein isn’t old news. The deflection is the news.
Relevant Article(s):
Trump Responds to Questions Over Epstein’s ‘Client List’
Optional Q&A:
- What did Trump gain by cutting off a reporter’s Epstein question to AG Pam Bondi and calling it “old news”?
- Why would a man who campaigned on “draining the swamp” try so hard to bury Epstein-related inquiries?
- How are MAGA supporters reconciling Trump’s deflection with their own demands for justice and transparency?
- Is Trump’s reaction a sign that powerful names connected to Epstein are still being protected?
- What role did Pam Bondi play in the Epstein saga, and why didn’t she answer for herself?
- Why is conservative media refusing to cover this incident when their audiences are demanding answers?
- Is the MAGA base starting to fracture as Trump’s actions clash with the movement’s core values?
- Could Trump’s “old news” dismissal backfire and reignite mainstream interest in Epstein’s still-hidden client list?
Press Kit: http://www.brookurick.com/press-kit
What is a sugar daddy? The real answer may disturb you. Fall into the sugaring underworld with Brook Urick as she comes to understand what happens when sugar daddy websites are left unchecked. First as a would-be sugar baby herself, then as a public relations pawn, ascending to company spokesperson where she learns the scariest truth of all: the people in charge are the ones she needs to worry about.
ABOUT BROOK URICK…
Former employee and attempted sugar baby, Brook Urick, writes a shocking memoir exposing what happens behind the scenes of a so-called “sugar daddy website.” She believes these are pseudo-dating websites designed to protect predators through intentional anonymity. Worse still, the website’s owner was arrested in a sting operation attempting to have sex with a minor. “The older I get, the younger these girls look,” says Urick of the women on Seeking Arrangement. “I felt compelled to tell people the truth. We can’t allow young women to get involved, sometimes unknowingly, in a life of sex work and abuse as a result of this website.” In her new book, she reveals the horrific details of systematic victimization, sex trafficking, fraud, and predatory behavior through the lens of both a sugar baby victim and as an internal employee at the company. “As I ascended the ranks I began to uncover the pieces of this evil puzzle,” Urick continues. “Now that I’m older I’ve finally been able to put them together.” Urick wants the DOJ to take a closer look at this website, especially after litigation called FOSTA-SESTA passed in 2018, explicitly making these websites criminally liable. Why is the website still around today? She’s wondering the same thing.
To Schedule an interview with Brooke, send an email to Bookings@SpecialGuests.com or call 512-966-0983
