Sophie’s Voice: WNBA Star’s Common Sensical Comments Ignite Firestorm off the Court
The WNBA’s Sophie Cunningham has become the newest face of America’s battle over the future of women’s sports after publicly defending the idea that female athletic competition should remain exclusively for biological women. Craig DeRoche, CEO of Family Policy Alliance, is available to discuss why this controversy has little to do with politics and everything to do with preserving fairness, safety, and the principles that gave women equal opportunities in athletics.
Last month, Cunningham’s pointing gesture on a WNBA court went viral. Since then, she’s been successfully riding a social media wave. However, now, she’s finding herself at the center of a non-sensical culture controversy, over transgenders in sports. The message? Pointing is fine. Pointing out obvious truths about men and women is another ball game.
CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE
- Women’s sports deserve protection based on principle, not popularity, to include the WNBA.
- Title IX was created to protect opportunities for female athletes, even in the WNBA.
- Fairness and safety should never depend on how many cases exist.
- Biological differences matter in athletic competition, even in the WNBA.
- Common sense—not political pressure—should guide sports policy, even in the WNBA.
Over the past month, the WNBA’s Cunningham has seen her public profile soar, eclipsing even Caitlin Clark online attention following her viral on-court pointing gesture. Now she finds herself at the center of another national debate after defending female-only sports, drawing both praise and condemnation as activists and politicians alike attempt to claim her as an ally.
The latest twist may be the most revealing. Cunningham’s own podcast co-host, West Wilson, publicly rejected her position, arguing that transgender participation in women’s sports is too rare to justify concern. His argument isn’t based on whether biological males have an unfair competitive advantage. Instead, it rests on the idea that the numbers are simply too small to matter.
That reasoning ignores the central issue.
Principles don’t become optional because relatively few people are affected. If fairness matters, it matters whether one female athlete loses a roster spot or one hundred do. If safety matters, it matters before—not after—a biological male seriously injures a female competitor. Rights aren’t measured by percentages, and justice isn’t determined by statistics.
Title IX was created to expand opportunities for women, not blur the very distinctions that made those opportunities possible. Once society accepts that fairness can be compromised because the affected population appears small, every protection becomes conditional.
Cunningham’s experience also illustrates how quickly public figures are pulled into today’s political tribalism. The moment she voiced support for protecting women’s sports, opposing camps rushed to either celebrate or condemn her instead of addressing the underlying principle.
DeRoche can discuss why protecting women’s sports is ultimately a matter of common sense rather than politics, why the “it’s only a few athletes” argument fails both morally and logically, how Title IX’s original purpose is being challenged, and why defending women and girls should never depend on how many people happen to be affected.
Relevant Article(s):
Sophie Cunningham backed by Sen. Graham on transgender sports stance | Fox News
Sophie Cunningham’s podcast cohost defends trans athletes
Let Parents Parent – Family Policy Alliance
OPTIONAL Q&A:
- Why has Sophie Cunningham’s stance resonated with so many Americans?
- Does the “it’s only a few athletes” argument completely miss the point?
- Why should principles matter more than percentages when protecting women’s sports?
- What would supporters of transgender participation say if a biological male seriously injured a female athlete?
- Has Title IX drifted from its original purpose of ensuring equal opportunities for women?
- Why are more female athletes willing to risk criticism by speaking out?
- When did defending women’s sports become more controversial than redefining them?
- What practical steps should lawmakers, schools, and athletic organizations take to preserve fairness and safety in women’s sports?
ABOUT CRAIG DEROCHE…
Craig DeRoche serves as President and CEO of Family Policy Alliance, the central hub of the pro-family movement, equipping citizens, churches, and elected officials to protect children, defend parents’ rights, and advance biblical values through civic engagement. Under Craig’s leadership, FPA and its network of 40 state family policy councils have helped lead major national campaigns including Save Girls Sports, Help Not Harm, After Roe, and Let Parents Parent.
Craig previously served as Speaker of the House in Michigan and president of Justice Fellowship, founded by Watergate figure, Chuck Colson. He is a frequent speaker and author on faith, culture, public policy, and civic engagement and has been featured in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Fox News, and Christianity Today. Craig is also a devoted husband and father and the author of Highly Functional and Outrageous Justice.
TO SCHEDULE AN INTERVIEW, CALL OR TEXT 512-966-0983 OR EMAIL BOOKINGS@SPECIALGUESTS.COM
